Wallet Logo Listing for Trust Wallet: Adding and Managing Token Display

What does wallet logo listing work include?

Wallet logo listing work involves preparing approved asset data and supporting its review by the relevant platforms. The outcome depends not only on the image file: the name, network, contract address, and public project sources must all refer to the same token.

We start by reviewing the inputs and determine which actions are appropriate for your asset: preparing materials for Trust Wallet, assisting with verification on Jupiter, or checking presence in available token lists. This is not a one-size-fits-all listing: different wallets and services use their own data sources and review procedures.

Before starting, it helps to prepare:

• contract address and exact network name;
• official token name and ticker;
• original logo and its versions, if available;
• links to the website, documentation, and official project channels;
• details of contract migration or rebranding.

If information differs across channels, we first align it, then prepare the submission. For a broader project listing task, use the listings and verification section.

How to prepare data so the wallet correctly recognizes the token?

For proper review, you need a single, verifiable set of asset information. Before submission, we cross-check the contract address, network, name, ticker, public links, and provided logo to ensure no contradictions in the materials.

Start with the project's primary sources: website, documentation, and official accounts. Make sure the explorer link points to the correct contract and the image matches the current brand. If the token migrated to a new contract or changed its name, prepare a brief explanation and supporting links. If needed, a separate task for updating explorer information is described in the token logo and data in explorer service.

Also check in advance:

• whether the address in project materials matches the network explorer;
• whether different ticker or name variants are used;
• whether official pages are accessible without entering closed communities;
• whether the current logo version is clear;
• whether outdated information remains in public descriptions.

If the project needs to separately confirm circulating supply, that is a different procedure with its own data set; it can be considered through circulating supply verification. Such verification does not replace the logo display submission.

How does the Trust Wallet process work?

Work with Trust Wallet begins with assessing project readiness, after which we collect and standardize the data needed for the asset request. We then support the submission and track available statuses, informing the client if clarification or additional material is needed.

We do not replace the project team: we need accurate token information and confirmation that the provided links and images are current. On our side, we structure information, check consistency, prepare materials, and manage communication within the agreed scope. Before starting, we clarify whether the request concerns a token already present in the wallet's sources or requires work on display and inclusion in the list.

The typical workflow is:

• review the network, contract address, and current public data;
• note discrepancies and request missing information;
• prepare a material package for the chosen direction;
• submit the request and record its status;
• report the review outcome and next steps.

Simultaneously updating profiles in other trackers may require separate work. For example, migration and rebranding issues are described in the data update for migration or rebranding service.

How does verification on Jupiter differ from working with token lists?

Verification on Jupiter, display in Trust Wallet, and presence in a token list are related but not identical tasks. Each service has its own data sources, interface, and review process, so one successfully processed request does not automatically mean the asset appears in all wallets.

Before starting, we determine the priority: correct or supplement data for a specific wallet, go through the available verification procedure on Jupiter, or prepare data for multiple directions. We then record which actions are included in the scope and which require a separate request. If a token displays without a logo, we first check where the wallet gets its data and whether the asset identifiers match. If the goal is to improve the project's card completeness in a third-party tracker, DEXTools and DEXScreener profile update may be suitable, but this does not replace wallet work.

When choosing a direction, consider:

• where exactly the user should see the asset;
• which network and contract are used;
• which information is already publicly confirmed;
• whether a logo, verification, or card update is needed.

A clear task definition helps avoid mixing different procedures and determine in advance which status will count as completion of our part of the work.

What do you receive and how is the timeline estimated?

You receive a verified set of source information, support for the agreed submission, and a clear status report. The timeline cannot be accurately stated before checking project readiness: it depends on material completeness, the need for corrections, and the review time of the relevant platform.

Before starting, we define the work goal, required directions, and materials provided by the team. If the data is ready and consistent, we can proceed to preparing the request. If outdated links, network ambiguity, or multiple logo versions are found, we first agree on corrections. This reduces the risk of having to supplement the request due to inconsistencies.

The deliverables include:

• cross-check of received data and list of discrepancies found;
• approved material set for the chosen procedure;
• submission support within the project scope;
• status recording and further recommendations.

Before starting, the client confirms the accuracy of the contract address and the right to use brand materials. Upon completion, we separately report what our team did, what status was obtained, and what actions remain for the project. For evaluating related tasks and scope of work, you can also see the how we work page.

What limitations are important to consider before submission?

The decision on verification, list inclusion, and display method is made by the respective platform. We can prepare materials, support submission, and perform the agreed scope of work, but we cannot guarantee approval, a specific interface position, or logo appearance in all wallets simultaneously. We also cannot guarantee the token price, organic volume, or viral project spread.

Even with correct submission, results may differ between wallets: services may use different data sources and update data in their own order. Therefore, it is useful to agree on a verifiable result criterion before starting—for example, the status of the request or the fact that the chosen request was processed, rather than an assumption that changes will immediately appear for every user.

Check before agreeing on the task:

• whether one current contract and the correct network are specified;
• whether official project links are confirmed;
• whether the important service and status are defined;
• whether you are ready to respond quickly to requests for missing data;
• whether logo work is separated from other listing tasks.

This approach allows evaluating work based on completed actions and documented status, rather than a promise of a decision made by an external service.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Collect source informationYou provide the network, contract address, name, ticker, logo, and official links. We clarify where exactly display or verification is needed.
2. Check data consistencyWe cross-check information across sources and note gaps. If there is migration or rebranding, we agree on supporting materials before submission.
3. Define the scope of workWe record whether the task relates to Trust Wallet, Jupiter, a token list, or multiple directions. We agree on the support scope and price.
4. Prepare and support submissionWe structure materials, submit the request for the chosen direction, and track the available status.
5. Deliver final statusWe report what actions were completed, what the platform responded, and whether further steps are needed for the project.